 |
Sen Bukola Saraki |
Despite some reservations, the
new leaders of the Eighth National Assembly emerged yesterday. YUSUF ALLI
revisits some of the intrigues behind the choice of Bukola Saraki and Ike
Ekweremadu as leaders of the Red Chamber.
SAN faults process.
A Senior advocate, Robert
Clarke, has faulted the process that produced a new leadership for the Senate
yesterday.
Clarke, who spoke on Channel Television, asserted that what the
senators did amounted to disenfranchising 51 other members at a time they were
not sworn in.
He noted that the rule of the Senate that the senators quoted to
support their claim on quorum formation was equally wrong.
He called on the leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC)
to fight the matter in court.
After two weeks of
horse-trading, lobbying and outright conspiracy, the battle for the soul of the
Senate climaxed in a coup d’etat by
the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) that led to the emergence of ex-Kwara State
Governor Bukola Saraki as the President of the Eighth Senate and the return of
Chief Ike Ekweremadu as the Deputy Senate President for the third term. With a
configuration of 59 All Progressives Congress (APC) senators to PDP’s 49, the
development saw the PDP regaining a little rebound from the devastating defeat
it suffered in the hand of the rival APC on March 28 and April 11 elections.
Countdown to inauguration
Prior to the
inauguration, there had been bitter straw polls in the APC which led to the
selection of Ahmed Lawan and George Akume as the party’s candidates for the
Office of the Senate presidency and and Deputy Senate Presidency. Former
Minority Leader Femi Gbajabiamila and Tahir Monguno also emerged as the party’s
preferred candidates for the leadership of the House of Representatives. The
outcome of the shadow elections created rumpus in the party with those defeated
threatening to defy the APC leadership. Worried by the threats, APC National
Chairman John Odigie-Oyegun, said: “I want to appeal to APC members of the
National Assembly, both Senate and the House of Representatives, to please
respect the party, the views of the party and the decision that they themselves
took in selecting the persons that will be presented to the National Assembly
as presiding officers.”
Buhari’s neutrality
lacuna and G-7 meeting
Despite the choice of
National Assembly leaders being a mixture of party politics and legislative
duty, the aloofness, or the perceived neutrality of the President allowed the
‘fight’ wthin APC to fester until it went of hand. Until President Muhammadu
Buhari left for the G-7 meeting last Friday, the jostle for the Senate
Presidency was still an open race between Saraki and Lawan. But pro-Saraki
loyalists used the opportunity to work on strategists, friends, associates and
relations of the President on why Lawan is loyal to APC National Leader Asiwaju
Bola Tinubu.
A respected source
said: “In what appeared like a brainwash, they warned these people not to allow
Tinubu to form a ring around the President. They even attributed some concocted
statements to Tinubu to create a gulf between him and the President. The
overall target was to instigate the relations and associates of the President
to influence him. And these propagandists spoke with those who have the ears of
the President.
In order to checkmate
Femi Gbajabiamila, who enjoyed considerable followership, loyalists of the new
Speaker of the House of Representatives dug into archives and recruited some
elements to approach the court to hang moral issues on his neck over his
alleged disrobing in the United States of America (USA). And the last straw
that broke the Carmel’s back was the twilight propaganda among members from the
Northwest, Northeast and Northcentral that Gabajabiamila is not a Muslim as
being claimed. It was therefore not a surprise that Dogara, who could barely
garner 56 votes among his APC colleagues went on to clinch the speakership
position with 182 votes yesterday.
The hefty funding of
the anti-APC project by some PDP governors, stalwarts and those who served as
ministers under the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan
assisted in deepening the crisis over the scramble for power between the camps
of Saraki and Lawan.
Huge funds were spent
to camp and cater for potential voters such that those otherwise rated as
conscientious lawmakers sold out in the end. “I think the highest bidder had an
upper hand, “said a Senator from the Northwest. The target of these PDP
moneybags is to prove that the APC is not prepared for governance at all.”
One major issue that
dominated the pre-inauguration politics of the National Assembly leadership was
the alleged marginalisation of members of the New PDP which defected from the
PDP to the APC in the power-sharing formula of the Buhari administration.
President Buhari’s delay in appointing key aides like the Secretary to the
Government of the Federation and Chief of Staff also fuelled the suspicion of
the New PDP elements that they might be completely edged out. These fears were
shared with new senators and representatives leading to leaders of the New PDP
taking their destiny in their hands by hijacking the Senate and House
leadership. By the time some APC governors convened in Abuja on Monday, it was
difficult and too late to salvage the situation
Botched meeting with Buhari
Against all
predictions of a possible neck-to-neck contest between Saraki and the former
Chairman of the Senate Committee on Public Accounts, Sen. Ahmed Lawan, the PDP
played a smart one on the ruling APC to “install” Saraki. The day began with
suspense and a water-tight security siege on the National Assembly. The
militarisation left most mobile phones of Senators and members-elect, guests,
workers and journalists buzzing, seeking intervention on how to gain entrance
into the sprawling Assembly Complex. No one was sure the election of the
principal officers of the Senate would hold. In ensuing confusion, a
terse statement by the APC National Publicity Secretary Lai Mohammed inviting the
Senators and members-elect for a meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari at the
International Conference Centre (ICC) provided some relief. The invitation was
said to be at the behest of the President. The summons however provided the PDP
an opportunity to act faster to install Saraki.
While 51 pro-Lawan
Senators relocated to the ICC, Abuja for an emergency audience with the
President, 57 Senators (mostly PDP) hurriedly left for the Senate Chamber for
the inauguration of the Eighth Senate. The bewildered 51 APC Senators, who were
waiting endlessly for the President in ICC, watched the proceeding of the
inaugural session from a nearby TV box. Before the 51 APC Senators could
race down the five-kilometre stretch from ICC to the Assembly Complex, Saraki
had emerged as an unopposed candidate. To add insult to injury, President
Muhammadu Buhari neither showed up nor sent apology to the stranded Senators at
the ICC. They were left at the mercy of troops from the Brigade of Guards, who
had already been deployed in the centre ahead of the supposed arrival of the
President.
Conspiracy and the
Buhari factor
According to
investigation, the initial plan by the President was to delay the inauguration
of the Senate by one hour for fence mending by APC members of the National
Assembly and re-strategise on how to stop the PDP from capitalising on the
crack in the party. If the strategy had walked, the inauguration would
have held at about 11am.
A highly-placed
source, who spoke in confidence, said: “The President had actually made up his
mind to be at the ICC but there were feelers that some associates and strategists
prevailed on him not to dabble in the selection of the Assembly leadership
because he will portray himself as an inconsistent leader having promised not
to interfere in the internal affairs of the Legislature.
“Probably acting
pro-Saraki’s script, these associates/ strategists made the President to
realise that his last-minute intervention would amount to dancing to the tune
of one man: Asiwaju Bola Tinubu.
“The joker probably
made sense to the President and he chose to abandon the meeting at the ICC. Unfortunately,
there was no communication between his office and the 51 APC Senators who
heeded his invitation.
“It was around
10.35am, we saw that the inaugural session was already on and Saraki had been
elected. If we were to be defeated, it should have been done on the floor.”
A battle of forces at play
The forces behind
Saraki were as intimidating as those for Lawan. These include: former Vice
President Atiku Abubakar, some of the former G-5 governors (like Rabiu
Kwankwaso, Aliyu Wammako), who defected from the PDP. Others are former
governors Ahmed Sani Yerima (Zamfara), Danjuma Goje (Gombe), Godswill Akpabio
(Akwa Ibom), Theoodore Orji (Abia) as well as governors Aminu Waziri Tambuwal
(Sokoto), Ayo Fayose (Ekiti), Dr. Rahman Mimiko (Ondo) and Nyesom Wike
(Rivers).
As for Lawan, he
pulled heavyweights from the APC National Working Committee (NWC), Asiwaju
Tinubu, Chief Bisi Akande, APC governors, ex-governors Abdullahi Adamu
(Nasarawa), Bukar Abba Ibrahim (Yobe and Adamu Aliero (Kebbi). They
include: senators Kabir Gaya, Ajayi Borrofice, Gemade Barnabas, Adamu
Abdullahi, Jide Omoworare, Abu Ibrahim, Bayero Nafada, Gbenga Ashafa, Sola
Adeyeye, Abdullahi Abubakar Gumel, Suleiman Hunkuyi, Ahmed Barau Jibrin and
Isiaka Adeleke.
Others are: senators
Nazif Suleiman, Nafada Ibrahim, Mrs. Oluremi Tinubu, Shehu Sani, Solomon
Olamilekan, Kabiru Marafa, Fatai Buhari, Mrs. Monsurat Sunmonu, Soji Akanbi,
Bala Na’Allah, Umaru Kurfi, and Mustapha Sani.
Last-minute deal
between Saraki and PDP
The last-minute deal
between the PDP and Saraki was sealed at the residence of former Senate
President David Mark in Abuja. At the meeting which held Sunday night were PDP
Senators and governors. The meeting lasted till the wee hours of Monday. The
session was tense on who to support for the leadership of the Senate and House
of Representatives.
A top source said: “At
the end of the day, we could not agree on bloc votes for any of the candidates
for the Senate and House of Representatives. In fact, Governor Ayodele Fayose
pleaded with party leaders to see the battles as one between PDP and Asiwaju
Bola Tinubu. He begged the party to ‘clip’ Tinubu’s wings.
“But some
senators-elect warned Fayose against going personal. They queried the morality
behind PDP supporting candidates who defected from the party to APC. They
alleged that their defection led to the defeat of PDP at the Centre.
“The governors also
split on who to back for the National Assembly offices. At the end of the day,
we could not reach a consensus on casting our votes en bloc for any of the
candidates for the leadership of the National Assembly. I can tell you that
everyone was on his own.”
Notwithstanding, the
PDP senators later opted to vote on Monday night on who to back in the Senate.
In the wee hours of yesterday, 28 opted for Saraki/Ekweremadu ticket and 17
consented to Ahmed Lawan/George Akume ticket. The same voting strength was
taken to the inaugural session of the Eighth Senate.
A source added: “We
were at a crossroads on whether to forgive Saraki for defecting to the APC or
paying back the APC in its own coins for making Aminu Tambuwal, the Speaker of
the Seventh Senate, to defect in defiance of the PDP directive. We basically
went for vengeance because all is fair in politics.
“Our assumption is
that were it not for mismanagement of PDP crisis, the likes of Saraki are PDP
in spirit and APC by circumstance. When there is realignment of forces, we
believe we can still work together.”
But findings confirmed
that the choice of Saraki was with a cost. The new President of the Senate was
‘forced’ to sacrifice his favourite for the Office of the Deputy President of
the Senate, Sen. Ali Ndume, who was the arrowhead of Saraki’s campaign in the
North. Although Ndume got a wind of the plot on Monday evening, he dismissed it
as “distracting and impossible for Saraki to dump him.”
Another source added:
“Till the last minutes, they sold a dummy to Ndume that he will be Deputy
Senate President of the Senate if Saraki gets the ticket.
“But as soon as Saraki
won, Ekweremadu was nominated for delivering bloc votes of the Senators-elect
from the Southeast in collaboration with Senator Andy Uba.”
Five reasons Saraki emerged as
Senate President
•Gang up against
Tinubu and the Southwest.
The outcome of the
results of the election of leaders of the National Assembly showed a
deep-seated hatred for Asiwaju Tinubu. Some APC leaders were said to be angry
that President Buhari at every forum had always acknowledged Tinubu as if he
was the only hero of change in the country. A few ones assumed that the
President was conceding too much to Tinubu and that former Lagos governor must
be cut to size. Others also felt that with the Office of the Vice President,
the Southwest has got more than its fair share of power. The amalgam of forces
merely used Saraki as the springboard.
•Sheer politics of betrayal.
Many, who won tickets
into the National Assembly on the goodwill of Tinubu, opted to betray him. They
just keyed into the plot against Tinubu without weighing the consequences.
•Absence of a
power-sharing formula in APC
The refusal of the APC
leadership to address this important index of power-sharing formula deprived
its National Assembly members of the much-needed unity. If there had been an
acceptable formula in place, the situation may not degenerate to this extent.
What Saraki did was to be tactical in conceding the Deputy Senate President to
the Southeast which is almost relegated to the background by the Buhari
administration.
•Emerging politics of
realignment.
Saraki’s election has
signposted the looming realignment of forces between some APC and PDP leaders
in the race to 2019. Ekweremadu has been saddled with the responsibility of
repositioning the PDP and he is already reaching out to aggrieved APC leaders.
In christening their group, pro-Saraki forces branded it as ‘Senators of Like
Minds’. The successful alliance between PDP and loyalists of Saraki might be
the beginning of what the nation should expect in the next few months.
According to sources, one of the sections which the Eighth National Assembly
might review is the one which makes defection unlawful. This will enable APC
members in the National Assembly to romance the PDP, or engage in anti-party
activities. Some APC leaders saw some hope in the proposed realignment and
embraced Saraki.
•Saraki’s antecedents
The records of Saraki
has built a huge political network for him. The mileage includes being a former
governor, a former Chairman of the Nigeria Governors Forum (NGF), his role in
the administration of the late President Umaru Yar’Adua, experience as a former
presidential endowment with charitable war chest and now a two-term Senator.
Consequences of
PDP’s coup for Buhari
Responding to the
emergence of leadership in the Senate, Buhari said “though a constitutional
process has somewhat occurred”, he would have preferred that the wish of the
APC leadership was respected on the choice of candidates. The agenda of PDP in
supporting Saraki smacked of “vengeance.” The coup is a signal of of likely antagonism,
criticisms and reckless opposition politics that Buhari should expect
henceforth. At least, President Buhari will be kept on his toes by the PDP if
he has the political temperament to withstand it. The PDP is ready to hold him
responsible for all his campaign promises and he might not have a rest of mind
until he delivers.
What becomes of Saraki’s
tenure? Will there be peace in the National Assembly?
Since yesterday, the
debate has focused on the legality of the election of the President of the Senate
by 57 Senators, the Speaker and other principal officers of the National
Assembly. Prof. Auwalu Yadudu, who was a former Special Adviser on Legal
Matters to the late Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha, said the election of
Saraki was illegal and unconstitutional. The Clerk to the National Assembly,
Salisu Maikasuwa, however, said “37 Senators were needed to form a quorum.” The
Constitution says any member of the National Assembly can lead any of the
chambers with votes from one-third of members.
For a National
Assembly that has been bankrolled from its first assignment, President Buhari
may as well forget his anti-corruption agenda. A case of “money for hand, back
for ground cannot be ruled out.”
But the APC raised
moral issue on the emergence of Saraki.
In a statement by its
spokesman Mohammed, the APC said: “APC decried a situation in which some
people, based on nothing but inordinate ambition and lack of discipline and
loyalty, will enter into an unholy alliance with the very same people whom the
party and indeed the entire country worked hard to replace and sell out the
hard won victory of the party.
‘’There can be no
higher level of treachery, disloyalty and insincerity within any party,’’ the
party said, vowing to resolve the matter using all constitutional and legal
means available to it.”
Although the APC has
directed the ‘dribbled’ 51 Senators to go to the Senate for inauguration, the
nation might have not heard the last word on Saraki’s emergence and others. The
PDP coup might lead to a change of leadership or distress in the Senate and
House of Representatives. The extent to which Saraki is able to manage the
aftermath of the election will determine his political altitude. But certainly,
a counter-plot against his presidency is not unlikely by the PDP or even APC.
Is APC’s future bleak?
The tone of the
reaction of APC suggested a looming crisis ahead. The APC is already
threatening sanctions against some of its chieftains.
It said: “Senator
Bukola and Hon. Dogara are not the candidates of the APC and a majority of its
National Assembly members-elect for the positions of Senate President and House
Speaker. The party duly met and conducted a straw poll and clear candidates
emerged for the posts of Senate President, Deputy Senate President and Speaker
of the House of Representatives, supported by a majority of all Senators-elect
and members-elect of the House of Representatives. All National Assembly
members-elect who emerged on the platform of the party are bound by that
decision.
‘’The party is supreme
and its interest is superior to that of its individual members. ‘Consequently,
the APC leadership is meeting in a bid to re-establish discipline in the party
and to mete out the necessary sanctions to all those involved in what is
nothing but a monumental act of indiscipline and betrayal to subject the party
to ridicule and create obstacles for the new administration.”
Unless an urgent
reconciliation is put in place, the anti-party activities which led to Saraki’s
Senate Presidency might cause a prolong crisis in the party. And with plans by
the APC leadership to enforce discipline, some leaders might call it quit with
the party.
Will Buhari now assert
himself?
Even if President
Buhari is not interested in a second term, he owes the APC a duty to keep the
party intact. The coup in the National Assembly by PDP is a litmus test for his
leadership prowess. The President may need to assert himself by playing a
fatherly role to reunite his political platform that is in tatters. When some
leaders met with the President after the coup in the Senate, he was said to “be
hollow” without a solution to the crisis at hand. The time to act is now.